Drunk Drivers, Bungee Jumping and Cell Phones
I had always thought that the reason laws are so severe regarding drunk driving was that it was a public safety issue. After considering some other laws, I conclude that it is a moral issue. There are still people out there who are opposed to drinking.
If drunk driving is truly a public safety issue it must be because driving while under the influence interferes with the person’s ability to respond quickly to emergency situations. I assume also that it interferes with a person’s ability to concentrate on the road and avoid going through STOP signs and running red lights. Drunk drivers also do not always keep all four wheels in their lane.
Now let’s consider the person talking on the cell phone. They do exactly the same thing but they are on the road in far greater numbers than drinkers and at peak traffic times.
The majority of drunks are usually on the road after the bars close when traffic is very light and they usually have both hands on the steering wheel.
The penalty for talking on a cell phone is what? Practically nothing. The cell phone talker does not end up in the newspapers and is not therefore publically shamed as the drunk driver is. Cell phone talkers drive right by police cars with impunity therefore driving while intoxicated must be a moral issue.
While on the subject of public versus personal safety, while do the police patrol so stringently for seat belts not being buckled? If a person has an accident without having himself/herself buckled down they are not a danger to someone else. It is a matter of personal rather than public safety.
Think about it, you are required to wear a seat belt in a heavily protected metal enclosure, with air bags to cushion you, but it’s OK to ride a motorcycle without one.
If caught, you will be fined for not wearing a seat belt in your own car where you are the responsible driver but it’s OK to ride on a bus driven by a total stranger without a seat belt.
Public safety laws can be really strange.
Helmets are required in most states for children riding bicycles but it’s OK to ride a skate board without one. Which of the two is most likely to fall and hit their heads?
Some states do require a helmet for roller-blading but then why not ice skating?
Texas, for instance, requires eye protection and helmets for off-road motorcycles. Vermont requires eye protection and helmets on the highway but not off-road where they are more likely to be needed.
I mentioned ‘bungee-jumping’ in the title because where are the limits to be drawn as to what we are permitted to do that is considered a personal risk?
It’s an arbitrary system that sometimes doesn’t seem logical. Maybe we do need to have someone hold our hand while we cross the road.
you made your case…add attorney to your resume and keep on writing!
I enjoy reading your posts, keep them coming
I agree that drivers using mobile phones are posing risks to other drivers on the roads. Usually when they receive a call, first they try to dig for their phones inside their pockets with one hand. If attempt fails, they will divert their attention to search for it in the car. That few seconds on diversion from traffic on the road to the phone can cause accidents! Secondly, after picking up the phone, they will slow down their driving speeds to a crawl and without warning thus endangering the driver behind him! What total morons. Sorry.
i am usually scurrying all over the net nearly all of the day thus I have a propensity to read quite a lot, which unfortunately is not usually a good factor as nearly all of the websites I discover are constructed of useless trash copied from various other web pages a thousand times, nevertheless I gotta say this webpage is really not bad at all and delivers a bit of original information, therefore cheers for breaking the phenomena of basically copying other folks’ sites, in case you ever wanna have fun with playing a few hands of zynga poker together with me just hit me up – you have my email
hello i submitted a question some time back related to just how to speed up my twilight eclipse website’s loading time due to the fact we made use of the very same theme during the time and somebody left a remark responding to it on my blog weeks ago – if that was you I just wanted to say many thanks, and if it was not you then sorry to bother you, but thanks nonetheless!
hehe okay so this is how mindless I am, midway through reading your post I accidentally dropped my computer mouse and shut the internet explorer by mistake and I could not locate your site again right up until 3 days afterwards to finish reading where I left off simply because I did not remember how I linked here in the first place lol in any case it was worth the wait..many thanks
my God, i thought you were heading to chip in with some decisive insght at the end there, not leave it with we leave it to you to choose.
My opinion is that anyone proven to be talking on a cell phone while driving should lose their driver’s license for a year for the first conviction and spend 90 days in prison.
For a second conviction: a year in prison and a permanent revocation of driving privileges.
These people are far more dangerous than drunk drivers yet the police ignore them.
You tell me what society should do to them.
If enough people express outrage maybe something will change.
How many people need to be killed by bus drivers and train operators “texting” before law enforcement takes this seriously?